We're delighted to host this premium cavalcade from New Zealand, first to see the sun.
Philip Macalister of Goodreturns tops the Kiwi connection with his weekly wrap. Phil's post gets primacy because if you want a round up of the current happenings in the risk market this wrap up will give the curious non-kiwi a flavour of the current issues in the market with links to reports on profit announcements for regional insurers (AXA, AMP and Asteron) news of our Inland Revenue's focus on insurance brokers not registered for good and services tax, and a piece on life insurance stats by yours truly.
Genetic testing for heart disease risk will likely put the cat among the Liberty pigeons around it's use in trauma cover rating. Best get across it now.
Another featured post is Henry Stern's piece on the way patient engagement in their care results in better care options being selected for them. It's the empowerment of the patient that I like, as well as the strong bodycheck to the 'provider knows best' of heavily state managed systems - such as our own, here in New Zealand. This reflects the underwriter's belief that the applicant tends to know intuitively a lot more about their health than you might think...
Jaan Sidorov of the DMCB really likes a report from actuary extraordinaire Bruce Pyenson of Milliman on how to get healthcare inflation under control While getting from here to there is politically daunting, the fact is that most of the recommendations are based on healthcare patterns that are already present in areas of the United States. Is “reform” really necessary when all you have to do is disseminate best practices across the country? Maybe not, especially when you also see what Sidorov has to say about the knuckleheads over at the Commonwealth Fund. In contrast to the actuaries, these policy lightweights are out of touch.
Heroes need not apply. Something instinctively strikes you when you read a story about someone who tried to prevent and assualt - and find they've have their benefits declined. It's the kind of issue you might never think would come up in group medical insurance, but where the heart should probably overrule the head, or in this case the policy document.
Michael F. Cannon reviews John Cochrane’s new paper on how deregulated insurance markets would provide “health status insurance” to insure people against increased premiums in case they pick up a chronic condition.
More fuel to the fire on the multi-vitamin issue. The great challenge with getting an education seems to be that so many placebos necessarily cease to work.
At Beyond Breast Cancer, blogger cool rain wants to get the word out that younger women are also at risk for developing breast cancer.
If thinking abbout young women's breasts has got you hot under the collar, stop and think for a moment before you reach for relief. The risks of masturbation seem to have been an obsession throughout the ages. Henry Stern deals with conflicting reports (hairy hands, short sight, etc, are not mentioned).
Risk, but not as we know it - Bill Pytlovany, blogging at Bits from Bill, takes software giant Adobe to task for leaving users' systems at risk of being hacked.
The idea that health insurance assistance may need to be provided to families with incomes of up to $250,000 per annum (about $400,000 New Zealand dollars, or about 10 times our average wage) may strike some kiwis as an indication of the great wealth of the United States. Wow.
It's good news again on vaccines. The Mothers-Mothers blog reports on new evidence that vaccines don't necessarily increase the risk of developing austism.
A basic reminder that insurance is meant to cover catastrophic risk (big, hard to predict events) always worth bearing in mind next time you're looking at medical cover...
I almost didn't include this post on changes to unemployment benefit provisions, but back in the UK we used to call this "National Insurance" and it's fair to say it's seen as an insurance policy by many that have to fall back on it. A quick summary.
Risk Management and Compliance bloggers have some words of wisdom regarding planning for individual facilities versus more intensive risk management schemes.
We also got a lot of personal finance links, which I have pretty savagely culled. If you popped us a note about an investment book, how to manage your mortgage, tax reduction, paying off your credit card, or some other such post, I love them. As you can see I often talk about personal finance on this blog. But this was the Cavalcade of Risk, and we stuck to that brief.
I was actually fascinated by some of the off-subject posts. One that deserves an honourable mention is the issue of disappointing people. It's inevitable that some of the off-subject submitters will be disappointed we didn't link to them, but this thoughtful article told me that's okay - you have to disappoint some people. ;-)
If you're thinking of de-lurking and hosting a cavalcade yourself then bear in mind this fortnight's post took about 2 hours to put together. That's a modest investment. It was also a lot of fun. I got to read aorund the traps and there are a number of blogs I will definitely be going back to.
If you're thinking you have something to contribute in the matters of Trauma or Dread Disease insurance, disability insurance, life insurance, or business insurance then I reckon we could do with a cavalcade with a good weighting on those subjects sometime - so get writing!
I am signing up for another. Meanwhile, feedback on this Cav is welcome.